Proteção de dados e humanidades digitais no Brasil: caixas-pretas

Keywords: Sociotechnical, Post-colonialism, General personal data protection law

Abstract

The effervescence of the theme of privacy and data protection around the world is growing, ranging from the preservation of the right to personality to the preservation of democratic principles as we traditionally know. Works have been developed seeking compliance with laws and regulations related to this theme, not observing a socio-technical epistemological side of digital humanities. In this paper I expose black boxes that communications make clear, serving as guide for further interdisciplinary research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BIONI, B. Proteção de Dados Pessoais - A Função e os Limites do Consentimento. ed. 2. São Paulo: Forense, 2019.

________. Xeque-Mate: O tripé da proteção de dados pessoais no jogo de xadrez das iniciativas legislativas no Brasil. São Paulo: GPoPAI/USP, 2015.

BRADFORD, A. The Brussels Effect. Northwestern University Law Review. 107 (1). SSRN 2770634, Columbia Law and Economics Working Paper n. 533, 2012.

CARVALHO, L.P.; CAPPELLI, C.; OLIVEIRA, J. Proteção de Dados no Brasil, uma visão Sociotécnica em Sistemas de Informação. 2º Encontro do INCT.DD. Salvador, Bahia. DOI 10.13140/RG.2.2.13999.89765. 2019.

COULDRY, N.; MEJIAS, U. Making data colonialism liveable: how might data’s social order be regulated? Internet Policy Review, 8 (2). DOI 10.14763/2019.2.1411. 2019.

CUKIERMAN, H.L.; TEIXEIRA, C.; PRIKLADNICKI, R. Um Olhar Sociotécnico sobre a Engenharia de Software. RITA, v. XIV, n. 2, 2007.

DLA PIPER. DATA PROTECTION LAWS OF THE WORLD, Full Handbook. Disponível em: https://www.dlapiperdataprotection.com/. 2019.

ESCOBAR, A. Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Londres: Duke University, 2018.

LATOUR, B. Cogitamus: seis cartas sobre as humanidades científicas. São Paulo: Editora 34, 2016.

__________ . Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2005.

____________. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Londres: Open University Press, 1987.

MARQUES, I. História das Ciências, Estudos CTS e os Brasis. Abertura do IX Congresso Scientiarum Historia. Rio de Janeiro, 2016.

MEDINA, E.; MARQUES, I.; HOLMES, C. Beyond Imported Magic. Essays on Science, Technology, and Society in Latin America. EUA: MIT Press, 2014.

MOOR, J. Why we need better ethics for emerging technologies. Ethics and Information Technology. v. 7 (3), pp. 111–119. DOI 10.1007/s10676-006-0008-0. 2005.

PINTO, R. SOBERANIA DIGITAL OU COLONIALISMO DIGITAL? Novas tensões relativas à privacidade, segurança e políticas nacionais. Disponível em: https://sur.conectas.org/soberania-digital-ou-colonialismo-digital/. 2018. Acesso em 01/12/2019.

SCOTT, M.; CERULUS, L. Europe’s new data protection rules export privacy standards worldwide. Disponível em: https://www.politico.eu/article/europe-data-protection-privacy-standards-gdpr-general-protection-data-regulation/. 2018. Acesso em 01/12/2019.

SOARES, G. Rumo à governança algorítmica - análise sociotécnica dos algoritmos de credit score: o caso chinês. XI Congresso Scientiarum Historia. Rio de Janeiro, 2018.

SUMPTER, D. Outnumbered: From Facebook and Google to Fake News and Filter-bubbles – The Algorithms That Control Our Lives. EUA: Bloomsbury Sigma, 2018.

ZUBOFF, S. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. EUA: PublicAffairs, 2019.
Published
2019-12-12
How to Cite
Carvalho, L. P., & Oliveira, J. (2019). Proteção de dados e humanidades digitais no Brasil: caixas-pretas. Scientiarum Historia Magazine, 1, 9. https://doi.org/10.51919/revista_sh.v1i0.32
Section
Historicidade de Saberes Tecnocientíficos